Ok, I just tried now and.
gnugk has been crashed without any notice!
with -tttttttttttttttt no information given, just segmentatition fault and exit!
Cisco-AVPair=....
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:53:27 +0400 (MSD), PS <block111@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we use RADIUS,
How we can send ivr-in message ?
IT says, unknown attrubute ivr-in and/or h323-ivr-in Therefore we cannot send ivr-in=priority-queue:gw1,gw.example.com,somethingelse.org:1800,123.23.45.76 .... OR h323-ivr-in=priority-queue:gw1,gw.example.com,somethingelse.org:1800,123.23.45.76 .... Is it in use now? or just an idea ?
This is an idea. It supposed to be send without any problems - it's CiscoAv-Pair h323-ivr-in=some:data
Please dont include radius in it.
As it is not necesary that all ppl r using radius. else they wud not be
benifited.
There shud be in ini file the gateways listings or can be modified Jan's
virtual queue application () for it.
Mical.
LCR.
Its all very good if u r thinking on these lines. As this feature is
desparately needed. How will you track gateways that they r offline or
online. u can implemnt them in separate service (as i told above)
2. what about balance showing feature on RRQ,ACF and after call
terminated.
Will you provide this feature? if so then when?
----- Original Message ----- From: "PS" <block111@xxxxxxxxx> To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, 26 June, 2004 11:41 AM Subject: Re: least cost rounting and failed calls.
reject
> >some calls just dont get setup, like send a call, i get back imediateto>message or i get back no ckt no channel. i think this could be re-sent>radius so that radius server would have the ability to define anotherroutedistinguish between a simple access request and rerouting request. It's>as in the current logic of least cost routing.
Not the best way - you'll also need to find some way for radius to
better to define something like an extra attribute that could be sent by
radius and understand by gnugk:
ivr-in=priority-queue:gw1,gw.example.com,somethingelse.org:1800,123.23.45.76 :1720;imso that gnugk will try sequentially all provided routes.
>small step to migrate to letting radius handle re-route issues. > >im actually not one of the persons that requires this re-route feature,>happy with the ability for radius to provide least cost routinginformation.>i also understand the other participants issues since they would likegnugk>to be in effect a soft switch. i also feel once we provide hooks forradius>to route, then radius could be the mechanism for this re-routing if wedefine>a clear set of conditions that require re-routing. again this would bemuch
a>future items. > >last note, i sent a post about my latest compile, any feedback. >thanks my friend. >ray > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. >Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - >digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, >unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > >_______________________________________________________ > >List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 >Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
-- Sait KARALAR Intersan voIP Telephony
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
-- Sait KARALAR Intersan voIP Telephony
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
