Re: least cost rounting and failed calls.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we use RADIUS,

How we can send ivr-in message ?

IT says, unknown attrubute ivr-in and/or h323-ivr-in
Therefore we cannot send
ivr-in=priority-queue:gw1,gw.example.com,somethingelse.org:1800,123.23.45.76 ....
OR
h323-ivr-in=priority-queue:gw1,gw.example.com,somethingelse.org:1800,123.23.45.76 ....
Is it in use now? or just an idea ?


On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:03:40 +0500, Rafat Subhan <rafat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Please dont include radius in it.
As it is not necesary that all ppl r using radius. else they wud not be
benifited.
There shud be in ini file the gateways listings or can be modified Jan's
virtual queue application () for it.
Mical.
LCR.
Its all very good if u r thinking on these lines. As this feature is
desparately needed. How will you track gateways that they r offline or
online. u can implemnt them in separate service (as i told above)
2. what about balance showing feature on RRQ,ACF and after call terminated.
Will you provide this feature? if so then when?






----- Original Message -----
From: "PS" <block111@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, 26 June, 2004 11:41 AM
Subject: Re:  least cost rounting and failed calls.



> >some calls just dont get setup, like send a call, i get back imediate
reject
>message or i get back no ckt no channel. i think this could be re-sent
to
>radius so that radius server would have the ability to define another
route
>as in the current logic of least cost routing.



Not the best way - you'll also need to find some way for radius to
distinguish between a simple access request and rerouting request. It's
better to define something like an extra attribute that could be sent by
radius and understand by gnugk:

ivr-in=priority-queue:gw1,gw.example.com,somethingelse.org:1800,123.23.45.76
:1720;
 so that gnugk will try sequentially all provided routes.



>small step to migrate to letting radius handle re-route issues.
>
>im actually not one of the persons that requires this re-route feature,
im
>happy with the ability for radius to provide least cost routing
information.
>i also understand the other participants issues since they would like
gnugk
>to be in effect a soft switch. i also feel once we provide hooks for
radius
>to route, then radius could be the mechanism for this re-routing if we
define
>a clear set of conditions that require re-routing. again this would be a
much
>future items.
>
>last note, i sent a post about my latest compile, any feedback.
>thanks my friend.
>ray
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
>Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
>digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
>unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
>
>_______________________________________________________
>
>List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
>Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/



------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/



-- Sait KARALAR Intersan voIP Telephony


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com


_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux