On Friday 23 January 2004 17:18, Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote: > Would not it be easier to just reject RRQ from this gateway (thus not > allowing it to register)? > Maybe some simple AliasAuth that rejects specific aliases/ips and while > accepting others. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "ray" <ray@gen3t.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:23 AM > > > i have a question, more like a situation. > > > > i have configured a perm endpoint with the ip and a prefix of 123. > > also i have configured GK to accept endpoint prefixs to 0, so to not > yes i can concieve several ways to block this one gw from registering, my larger concern is that anytime i allow gws to register, they can send a prefix and if they say send 011 or 1 by mistake, all routing goes away. i guess what i ask is that the perm endpoint prefix have more importance then if a gw registers with a prefix, this way i dont have to worry about static routes and prefixes that may throw things off if a gateway registers improperly. thanks foryour comment michal. regards ray ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
