Re: Using numeric alias results in call part registered

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



See comments in-line

> There a some functions in OpenH323 that _guess_ the type of an alias 
>(H323 id or E.164) depending if the content is all numeric or not.
> Usually we get the aliases including type frome some incoming message, but for
>  example the RouteToAlias command only gets the alias name and then we guess.
I assumed it was an issue to something like that....

> Andrew and Tjapko have probably seen something similar. Can you describe under wich circumstances you had problems ?
Alias 696812 can call 0387429x without an issue
however if 0387429x calls 696812 I get an ARJ with Call party not
registered. I changed the Alias of 696812 to 696812a and it worked fine.
Note that when I register the end point it will quite happily register
696812 as the alias.

> Another posibility is that the endpoint did the guessing and got it wrong.
I have checked this out and you are correct, it seems that the client
itself sends does the check. 

This is a huge problem at the moment, I'm not a coder and if someone out
there can give me a patch for the Gatekeeper to check for Aliases if the
is no match on e164 addresses. I realise this may not stick with
convention but for what I'm doing here this kind of fix will suffice...
I would prefer to change the SDK but I know that the SDK developers will
not do that.

Regards

Andrew


> Regards,
> 	Jan
> 
> Tjapko Smits wrote:
> > 
> > No it doesn.t . I have noticed the same problem.  Tjapko.
> > 
> > 
> > >From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@onet.pl>
> > >Reply-To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >To: <openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > >Subject: Re:  Using numeric alias results in call part 
> > >registered
> > >Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 02:24:06 +0200
> > >
> > >Strange, should work fine...
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Andrew M" <andrew@healthshare.com.au>
> > >Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:59 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > > In GNUGK 2.04 I noticed that that if have an alias that is numeric only
> > > > i.e 696821 cannot be dialled to from anyone. However if I give this an
> > > > alphanumeric character of say 'a' at the end (so it becomes 696821a) it
> > > > works no problem. It seems if it's numeric only GNUGK thinks this is the
> > > > EPID not an alias (yes there is a reason these aliases are numeric and
> > > > not assigned as uid's)
> > > > Is this problem fixed in 2.05?
> > > > Can it be fixed?



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux