Yes ofcourse, Long time ago! when my customer made a mistake and changed the h323 and e164 number field in his 1 port gateway he was able to get authorized because the unregister tool did not unregister the alias that was a phonenumber field without any caracters. SOFTPBX alias not found! Any caracter in the h323 id field is sufficent to let it work.
At that time I bypassed this anomaly by unregistering the endpoint as well.
Hope this info helps... Tjapko
From: Jan Willamowius <jan@willamowius.de>
Reply-To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Using numeric alias results in call part registered
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:36:59 +0200
There a some functions in OpenH323 that _guess_ the type of an alias (H323 id or E.164) depending if the content is all numeric or not.
Usually we get the aliases including type frome some incoming message, but for example the RouteToAlias command only gets the alias name and then we guess.
Andrew and Tjapko have probably seen something similar. Can you describe under wich circumstances you had problems ?
Another posibility is that the endpoint did the guessing and got it wrong.
Regards, Jan
Tjapko Smits wrote:
>
> No it doesn.t . I have noticed the same problem. Tjapko.
>
>
> >From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@onet.pl>
> >Reply-To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >To: <openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >Subject: Re: Using numeric alias results in call part
> >registered
> >Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 02:24:06 +0200
> >
> >Strange, should work fine...
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Andrew M" <andrew@healthshare.com.au>
> >Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:59 AM
> >
> >
> > > In GNUGK 2.04 I noticed that that if have an alias that is numeric only
> > > i.e 696821 cannot be dialled to from anyone. However if I give this an
> > > alphanumeric character of say 'a' at the end (so it becomes 696821a) it
> > > works no problem. It seems if it's numeric only GNUGK thinks this is the
> > > EPID not an alias (yes there is a reason these aliases are numeric and
> > > not assigned as uid's)
> > > Is this problem fixed in 2.05?
> > > Can it be fixed?
-- Jan Willamowius, jan@willamowius.de, http://www.willamowius.de/
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
_________________________________________________________________
Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: http://messenger.yupimsn.com/
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
