Hello Tjapko, scenario you are deploying should work fine with GK 2.0.5. Not the difference between "sitting on NAT box" and "sitting behind NAT box" - these are not the same. And "neighbour gk" is not the same as "child gk". I suppose you need to change some config options to deploy this scenario. If you will provide more details on config, I could help more. Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tjapko Smits - iTS Consultancy" <itsc99@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [Openh323gk-users] Strange test scenario > Thanks I will try this parameter next monday. When reading and interpreting > the manual about this subject I got the intention that when using the name > "proxy gk" for the child gk the child was doing the proxying for the NAT box > than breakout to a parentGK for certain prefixes thus avoiding proxy traffic > between parent EP and child gk but child gk takes care of the proxying to > his EP . If this is an interpretation error than please let me know. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
