On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:45 +0000, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I disagree. Just because the version in gcj is different doesn't mean
> it's correct. As far as I'm aware, Pekka already has a testcase for
> this so it would be good to have it in Mauve.
Sorry for the delay, here's a test case for getSimpleName().
Pekka
>From 3637ab8ec4f866da6fadc092eab1f99ce4adb417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:52:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mauve: Add test case for Class.getSimpleName()
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
gnu/testlet/java/lang/Class/ClassTest.java | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/testlet/java/lang/Class/ClassTest.java b/gnu/testlet/java/lang/Class/ClassTest.java
index 71b144c..c5927e8 100644
--- a/gnu/testlet/java/lang/Class/ClassTest.java
+++ b/gnu/testlet/java/lang/Class/ClassTest.java
@@ -577,6 +577,18 @@ public class ClassTest implements Cloneable, java.io.Serializable, Testlet
harness.check(in == null);
}
+ public void test_getSimpleName()
+ {
+ harness.checkPoint("test_getSimpleName");
+ harness.check(int.class.getSimpleName().equals("int"));
+ harness.check(int[].class.getSimpleName().equals("int[]"));
+ harness.check(int[][].class.getSimpleName().equals("int[][]"));
+ harness.check(Object[].class.getSimpleName().equals("Object[]"));
+ harness.check(Object.class.getSimpleName().equals("Object"));
+ harness.check(InnerClass.class.getSimpleName().equals("InnerClass"));
+ }
+ public static class InnerClass { };
+
public void testall()
{
test_toString();
@@ -594,6 +606,7 @@ public class ClassTest implements Cloneable, java.io.Serializable, Testlet
// This one doesn't work so well in Mauve.
// test_getResource();
test_getResourceAsStream();
+ test_getSimpleName();
}
--
1.7.0.4
