Re: Future blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/09/2010 12:44 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 11:03 Thu 09 Dec     , Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
>>
>>> I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
>>> inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
>>> and I had promised to use ".diff.txt" file extension but forgot
>>> about it after a long delay. (there is such problem in, say, hpl.com
>>> mailing list where I frequently send my patches to; besides, I have
>>> no problem in opening the attachment in the link below in Firefox
>>> which I use). I apologies for the inconvenience and I'll try to keep
>>> in my mind that it's better to use .txt extension when posting to
>>> this ML.
>>
>> This turns out to be a known Firefox bug:
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327323
>>
>> The bugzilla shows a way around this problem.  I appended the
>> following line to my .mailcap:
>>
>> application/octet-stream;/usr/bin/emacs "%u"
>>
>> So, at least it is now possible to see the patches without first
>> saving them and then opening in an editor as a separate action.
>>
>> Note that I am not recommending that anyone use incorrect MIME-types
>> in future, just that there is at least a workaround.
> 
> It also only solves part of the problem.  AFAICS, you still have to
> open the patch in an external application instead of reading it in the
> mail itself.

Yes, of course.  It's a lot less painful, though.

Andrew.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux