Hi Andrew and Pekka, Thank you Pekka but there are also some more ones (in June 2010): - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12989 (follow the link in body to get classpath-ivmai-05.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12988 (classpath-ivmai-06.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12982 (classpath-ivmai-07.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12983 (classpath-ivmai-08.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12984 (classpath-ivmai-09.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12985 (classpath-ivmai-10.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12986 (classpath-ivmai-11.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12991 (classpath-ivmai-12-v3.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12972 (classpath-ivmai-14.diff, discussed in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12975). classpath-ivmai-13.diff has just been reviewed by Andrew. And, here is the unprocessed ones listed by Pekka: - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006438.html (classpath-ivmai-15.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006439.html (classpath-ivmai-16.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006440.html (classpath-ivmai-17.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006441.html (classpath-ivmai-18.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006442.html (classpath-ivmai-19.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006443.html (classpath-ivmai-20.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006444.html (classpath-ivmai-21.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006445.html (classpath-ivmai-22.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006446.html (classpath-ivmai-23.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006447.html (classpath-ivmai-24.diff); - http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006448.html (classpath-ivmai-25.diff); And, some more unprocessed ones posted in July: - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13009 (classpath-ivmai-26.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13010 (classpath-ivmai-27.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13011 (classpath-ivmai-28.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13012 (classpath-ivmai-29.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13013 (classpath-ivmai-30.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13015 (classpath-ivmai-31.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13016 (classpath-ivmai-32.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13018 (classpath-ivmai-33.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13020 (classpath-ivmai-34.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13021 (classpath-ivmai-35.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13022 (classpath-ivmai-36.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13023 (classpath-ivmai-37.diff). and, the recently published ones (and discussed with Pekka): - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13052 (classpath-ivmai-38.diff); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13056 (classpath-ivmai-39.diff, the test case provided turned out to be irrelevant to the patch provided as discussed in the thread http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13078); - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13058 (classpath-ivmai-40.diff, just adds the test case for classpath-ivmai-33.diff). I really apologies for such huge amount of patches posted :( Regards. Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:32:20 +0200 Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> There's also 10-15 patches from Ivan sitting in the archives > > > > Hmm, I had seen some discussion around those and thought they were being > > addressed. Bring them on! > > I'm not sure if this is all of it but it's a start anyway: > ...
