Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/6/25 dalibor topic <robilad@xxxxxxxxx>:
Well I suppose the question is more 'how much OpenJDK is needed to be
substantially derived?'
It's hard to draw a minimum requirement line, so I guess it'll be a
case-by-case decision, when necessary.
I think a the majority of regular cases are obvious, though.
Is the TCK license available for general consumption yet?
Sure, it's been available since August 2007:
http://*openjdk*.java.net/legal/*openjdk*-*tck*-*license*.pdf
I'm slightly less perturbed by aph telling me that you do actually get
source code. The fact
that a myth to the contrary could permeate to me just shows the
problems with such NDA stuff... ;)
You'll have to check out the GB meeting's notes for more specific
details on the NDA stuff.
To say I'm not happy it's there would be an euphemism, but as far as TCK
NDA stuff goes, it
has been clarified by Sun in the discussin with the GB and stripped down
to a very specific form.
cheers,
dalibor topic
