Re: Classpath 0.97

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/02/2008, Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 23:05 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > FOSDEM is at the end of next week (22-25 Feb) and it would be nice to
> > have a new Classpath release for then.  I suggest we try and roll one
> > out for a week tomorrow (20 Feb).  Fingers crossed, I don't expect
> > enough to have changed for there to be too many regressions...
>
> Thanks for picking this up.
>
> > Let me know ASAP of any patches you think need to go in or bugs you
> > think need to be fixed before the release.
>
> There is one thing that I would like to get in if I have time. Chris
> agreed that it would be a good idea to include the GNU ClasspathX
> activation module now that javax.activation is part of the standard core
> classes. This is just new code and as soon as I notified FSF legal it
> will be maintained in our repo. No big deal if this misses the deadline
> though. I'll try to get it in asap.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>

I agree it would be nice to have that code in.  I take it that's a
typo in your mail and you still need to notify the FSF about the code.
 If  you handle that side of it, I can prepare a patch in the meantime
and then commit as soon as we get clearance.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :-)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux