On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 17:44 +0000, Luis Matos wrote: > Seg, 2013-10-28 às 13:27 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams escreveu: > > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 17:21 +0000, Marco Scannadinari wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 11:36 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 21:17 -0500, Andrew Ter-Grigoryan wrote: > > > > > Will the new Music app eventually gain Rhythmbox's radio, podcast, CD, > > > > > and Last.fm scrobbling features? Or is the goal just to keep it very > > > > > simple and pretty? > > > > Or, ditto, all the features and speed of Banshee. I'll probably just > > > > keep using banshee for the forsee-able future. > > > > And there is device and device-sync capability as well. > > > Come on guys - the project only started on the second half of last year. > > But there are applications which currently solve this problem > > excellently and have mature code-bases. At least for me, nobody has > > answered the question as to why this is a needed, or even a good idea. > > Do we really need to create yet-another-another-another media player? > Well ... i think gnome is getting its (small) man power badly used. If they are volunteers - they work on what they want to. I get that [being a volunteer developer as well]. I just do not understand the urge to write-from-scatch when several solid bases exist. > I believe that it would be nicer to see *new* development in a calendar > (i think it is going on), email, rss, twitter application because it is > true that evolution, unfortunately sucks (or oficially drop it and adopt > thunderbird). RhythmBox does his job well at least. No, Evolution has not sucked for some time now. 3.8.x is good, and 3.10.x is excellent. 3.4 & 3.6 where dodgy. -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
