Re: GlusterFS as virtual machine storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via virlock 
> or sanlock)?

Yes. Gluster has it's own quorum, you can disable it but that's just a
recipe for a disaster.

> Also, on a two-node setup it is *guaranteed* for updates to one node to 
> put offline the whole volume?

I think so, but I never took the chance so who knows.

> On the other hand, a 3-way setup (or 2+arbiter) if free from all these 
> problems?
> 

Free from a lot of problems, but apparently not as good as a replica 3
volume. I can't comment on arbiter, I only have replica 3 clusters. I
can tell you that my colleagues setting up 2 nodes clusters have _a lot_
of problems.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux