Re: GlusterFS as virtual machine storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 25-08-2017 08:32 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
Hi all,
any other advice from who use (or do not use) Gluster as a replicated
VM backend?

Thanks.

Sorry, I was not seeing messages because I was not subscribed on the list; I read it from the web.

So it seems that Pavel and WK have vastly different experience with Gluster. Any plausible cause for that difference?

WK wrote:
2 node plus Arbiter. You NEED the arbiter or a third node. Do NOT try 2
node with a VM

This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via virlock or sanlock)? Also, on a two-node setup it is *guaranteed* for updates to one node to put offline the whole volume? On the other hand, a 3-way setup (or 2+arbiter) if free from all these problems?

Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux