In my install of 1.4rc7, /sbin/mount.glusterfs is a simple shell script, and glusterfs is actually a symlink to glusterfsd. So, in short, I'd have to say that in 1.4rc7, yes, the client and server are one binary. Dan Parsons On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Kevan Benson wrote: > Sean Davis wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Kevan Benson >> <kbenson at a-1networks.com>wrote: >>> Anand Babu Periasamy wrote: >>>> 2.0.0rc1 will be available in a week. Before we call it 2.0.0, we >>>> want to >>>> to achieve the following: >>>> * Binary packages for GNU/Linux (rpm/deb), FreeBSD, Mac OS X and >>>> Solaris >>>> (server) >>> As for the RPM spec file, are you amenable to some alterations? >>> IMO it >>> would be preferable to build three packages instead of one, >>> glusterfs-common, glusterfs-client and glusterfs-server, following >>> the >>> common way client/server packages are built in RHEL/CentOS. >>> >>> I remember Matt's spec file used to be this way, but it looks like >>> you >>> guys specifically changed it: >>> >>> * Sat Apr 19 2008 Amar Tumballi <amar at zresearch.com> - 1.3.8pre6 >>> - Merged common, client and server packages into one package. >>> >>> Is there a reason for that? >>> >> Aren't client and server now one executable? I think so. > > Nope. At least not in 1.4rc7. > > /sbin/mount.glusterfs > /usr/sbin/glusterfs > /usr/sbin/glusterfsd > > -- > > -Kevan Benson > -A-1 Networks > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
