Sean Davis wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Kevan Benson <kbenson at a-1networks.com>wrote: > >> Anand Babu Periasamy wrote: >>> 2.0.0rc1 will be available in a week. Before we call it 2.0.0, we want to >>> to achieve the following: >>> * Binary packages for GNU/Linux (rpm/deb), FreeBSD, Mac OS X and Solaris >>> (server) >> As for the RPM spec file, are you amenable to some alterations? IMO it >> would be preferable to build three packages instead of one, >> glusterfs-common, glusterfs-client and glusterfs-server, following the >> common way client/server packages are built in RHEL/CentOS. >> >> I remember Matt's spec file used to be this way, but it looks like you >> guys specifically changed it: >> >> * Sat Apr 19 2008 Amar Tumballi <amar at zresearch.com> - 1.3.8pre6 >> - Merged common, client and server packages into one package. >> >> Is there a reason for that? >> > > Aren't client and server now one executable? I think so. Nope. At least not in 1.4rc7. /sbin/mount.glusterfs /usr/sbin/glusterfs /usr/sbin/glusterfsd -- -Kevan Benson -A-1 Networks
