On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Kevan Benson <kbenson at a-1networks.com>wrote: > Anand Babu Periasamy wrote: > > 2.0.0rc1 will be available in a week. Before we call it 2.0.0, we want to > > to achieve the following: > > * Binary packages for GNU/Linux (rpm/deb), FreeBSD, Mac OS X and Solaris > > (server) > > As for the RPM spec file, are you amenable to some alterations? IMO it > would be preferable to build three packages instead of one, > glusterfs-common, glusterfs-client and glusterfs-server, following the > common way client/server packages are built in RHEL/CentOS. > > I remember Matt's spec file used to be this way, but it looks like you > guys specifically changed it: > > * Sat Apr 19 2008 Amar Tumballi <amar at zresearch.com> - 1.3.8pre6 > - Merged common, client and server packages into one package. > > Is there a reason for that? > Aren't client and server now one executable? I think so. Sean > > Note: I would rather any changes to the spec file NOT hold up 2.0, so > if you would rather hold off on this until after 2.0 (if you think it's > valid), please do so. > > > * And most importantly the community blessing for 2.0 stable release. > > You have mine. :) > > -- > > -Kevan Benson > -A-1 Networks > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://zresearch.com/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090107/e37d0581/attachment.htm
