Re: Coverity fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2017 10:19 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over
> last few days, I have an observation for some of the patches the
> coverity issue id(s) are *not* mentioned which gets maintainers in a
> difficult situation to understand the exact complaint coming out of the
> coverity. From my past experience in fixing coverity defects, sometimes
> the fixes might look simple but they are not.
> 
> May I request all the developers to include the defect id in the commit
> message for all the coverity fixes?
> 

How does that work? AFAIK the defect IDs are constantly changing as some
get fixed and new ones get added.

(And I know everyone looks at the coverity report after their new code
is committed to see if they might have added a new issue.)

Today's defect ID 435 might be 436 or 421 tomorrow.


-- 

Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux