On 11/02/2017 10:19 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over > last few days, I have an observation for some of the patches the > coverity issue id(s) are *not* mentioned which gets maintainers in a > difficult situation to understand the exact complaint coming out of the > coverity. From my past experience in fixing coverity defects, sometimes > the fixes might look simple but they are not. > > May I request all the developers to include the defect id in the commit > message for all the coverity fixes? > How does that work? AFAIK the defect IDs are constantly changing as some get fixed and new ones get added. (And I know everyone looks at the coverity report after their new code is committed to see if they might have added a new issue.) Today's defect ID 435 might be 436 or 421 tomorrow. -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel