Coverity fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over last few days, I have an observation for some of the patches the coverity issue id(s) are *not* mentioned which gets maintainers in a difficult situation to understand the exact complaint coming out of the coverity. From my past experience in fixing coverity defects, sometimes the fixes might look simple but they are not.

May I request all the developers to include the defect id in the commit message for all the coverity fixes?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux