This is the first check where we just execute 'rebalance status' . That's the command which failed and hence failed the test case. If u see the test case, the next step is wait_for_rebalance_to_complete (status --xml). This is where we execute rebalance status until 5 minutes for rebalance to get completed. Even before waiting for rebalance, the first execution of status command failed. Hence the test case failed.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we had gone for rebalance status checks multiple times, I should have seen multiple entries of rebalance_status failure or at least a difference in time, isn't it?The above is the snip extracted from https://ci.centos.org/view/g.log.info("Starting Rebalance on the volume") ret, _, _ = rebalance_start(self.mnode, self.volname) self.assertEqual(ret, 0, ("Failed to start rebalance on the volume " "%s", self.volname)) g.log.info("Successfully started rebalance on the volume %s", self.volname) # Check Rebalance status g.log.info("Checking Rebalance status") ret, _, _ = rebalance_status(self.mnode, self.volname) self.assertEqual(ret, 0, ("Failed to get rebalance status for the " > "volume %s", self.volname)) E AssertionError: ('Failed to get rebalance status for the volume %s', 'testvol_distributed-# Start Rebalancedispersed') Gluster/job/gluster_glusto/ 377/console On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Shwetha Panduranga <spandura@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:-ShwethaAt every step we check the exit status of the command output. If the exit status is non-zero we fail the test case.4) wait_for_rebalance_to_complete ( This get's the xml output of rebalance status and keep checking for rebalance status to be 'complete' for every 10 seconds uptil 5 minutes. 5 minutes wait time can be passed as parameter )3) Execute: 'rebalance status' ( there is no time delay b/w 2) and 3) )2) Trigger rebalanceCase:1) add-brick when IO is in progress , wait for 30 secondsOn Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <sankarshan.mukhopadhyay@gmail.com > wrote:On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 00:23, Shwetha Panduranga <spandura@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shyam, we are already doing it. we wait for rebalance status to be
>> complete. We loop. we keep checking if the status is complete for '20'
>> minutes or so.
>
>
> Are you saying in this test rebalance status was executed multiple times
> till it succeed? If yes then the test shouldn't have failed. Can I get to
> access the complete set of logs?
Would you not prefer to look at the specific test under discussion as well?
_______________________________________________ http://lists.gluster.org/mailm
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
an/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel