Re: Release 3.12: Glusto run status

[Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

14:15:57         # Start Rebalance
14:15:57         g.log.info("Starting Rebalance on the volume")
14:15:57         ret, _, _ = rebalance_start(self.mnode, self.volname)
14:15:57         self.assertEqual(ret, 0, ("Failed to start rebalance on the volume "
14:15:57                                   "%s", self.volname))
14:15:57         g.log.info("Successfully started rebalance on the volume %s",
14:15:57                    self.volname)
14:15:57     
14:15:57         # Check Rebalance status
14:15:57         g.log.info("Checking Rebalance status")
14:15:57         ret, _, _ = rebalance_status(self.mnode, self.volname)
14:15:57         self.assertEqual(ret, 0, ("Failed to get rebalance status for the "
14:15:57 >                                 "volume %s", self.volname))
14:15:57 E       AssertionError: ('Failed to get rebalance status for the volume %s', 'testvol_distributed-dispersed')

 

The above is the snip extracted from https://ci.centos.org/view/Gluster/job/gluster_glusto/377/console

If we had gone for rebalance status checks multiple times, I should have seen multiple entries of rebalance_status failure or at least a difference in time, isn't it?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Shwetha Panduranga <spandura@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Case:

1) add-brick when IO is in progress , wait for 30 seconds

2) Trigger rebalance

3) Execute: 'rebalance status' ( there is no time delay b/w 2) and 3) )

4) wait_for_rebalance_to_complete ( This get's the xml output of rebalance status and keep checking for rebalance status to be 'complete' for every 10 seconds uptil 5 minutes. 5 minutes wait time can be passed as parameter )

At every step we check the exit status of the command output. If the exit status is non-zero we fail the test case.

-Shwetha

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <sankarshan.mukhopadhyay@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 00:23, Shwetha Panduranga <spandura@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shyam, we are already doing it. we wait for rebalance status to be
>> complete. We loop. we keep checking if the status is complete for '20'
>> minutes or so.
>
>
> Are you saying in this test rebalance status was executed multiple times
> till it succeed? If yes then the test shouldn't have failed. Can I get to
> access the complete set of logs?

Would you not prefer to look at the specific test under discussion as well?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel