Re: bug-822830.t fails on release-3.5 branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Santosh Pradhan <spradhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks guys for looking into this. I am just wondering how this passed the
> regression before Niels could merged this in? Good part is test case needs
> modification not code ;)

We need a single maintainer for test cases alone to keep stability
across, this would occur
if some changes introduce races as we add more and more test cases.

For example chmod.t from posix-compliance fails once in a while and it
is not never maintained
by us.
-- 
Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse
regulation with outcomes
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux