Re: bug-822830.t fails on release-3.5 branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/04/2014 12:04 PM, Harshavardhana wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Santosh Pradhan <spradhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks guys for looking into this. I am just wondering how this passed the
regression before Niels could merged this in? Good part is test case needs
modification not code ;)
We need a single maintainer for test cases alone to keep stability
across, this would occur
if some changes introduce races as we add more and more test cases.
I don't mind maintaining it along with Justin if people are okay with it.

Pranith.

For example chmod.t from posix-compliance fails once in a while and it
is not never maintained
by us.

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux