Thanks guys for looking into this. I am just wondering how this passed
the regression before Niels could merged this in? Good part is test case
needs modification not code ;)
-Santosh
On 07/04/2014 11:51 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
On 07/04/2014 11:20 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/04/2014 11:19 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
On 07/04/2014 11:09 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Ravi,
I already sent a patch for it in the morning at
http://review.gluster.com/8233
Review please :-)
830665.t is identical in master where it succeeds. Looks like
*match_subnet_v4() changes in master need to be backported to 3.5
as well.
That is because Avati's patch where EXPECT matches reg-ex is not
present on release-3.5
commit 9a34ea6a0a95154013676cabf8528b2679fb36c4
Author: Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jan 24 18:30:32 2014 -0800
tests: support regex in EXPECT constructs
Instead of just strings, provide the ability to specify a regex
of the pattern to expect
Change-Id: I6ada978197dceecc28490a2a40de73a04ab9abcd
Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/6788
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Shall we backport this?
I think we should; reviewed http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8235/.
Thanks for the fix :)
Pranith
Pranith
On 07/04/2014 11:00 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Hi Niels/ Santosh,
tests/bugs/bug-830665.t is consistently failing on 3.5 branch:
not ok 17 Got "*.redhat.com" instead of "\*.redhat.com"
not ok 19 Got "192.168.10.[1-5]" instead of "192.168.10.\[1-5]"
and seems to be introduced by http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8223/
Could you please look into it?
Thanks,
Ravi
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
