Re: bug-822830.t fails on release-3.5 branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/07/2014, at 7:34 AM, Harshavardhana wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Santosh Pradhan <spradhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks guys for looking into this. I am just wondering how this passed the
>> regression before Niels could merged this in? Good part is test case needs
>> modification not code ;)
> 
> We need a single maintainer for test cases alone to keep stability
> across, this would occur
> if some changes introduce races as we add more and more test cases.
> 
> For example chmod.t from posix-compliance fails once in a while and it
> is not never maintained
> by us.

Yeah, I'm not really sure what we should do about the smoke test stuff.

Possibly useful?

  http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/2014-March/000068.html

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux