Re: Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Joe Julian" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms. 

Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---

When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I don't think we know, do we?

And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to glusterfs?

In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of extra RPMs. Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a convenient way.

Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a heartbeat because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at that point.

Thoughts?

--

Kaleb



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux