If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms. Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 08/08/2012 11:57 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >> Currently the glusterfs*-3.3.0 RPMs in Fedora 18 do not contain the UFO feature. >> >> As I work on revising the Fedora RPM packaging for 3.3.x, my intention is to cons up a single .spec that produces glusterfs + UFO. I.e. UFO = swift + gluster plug-in. But the RPMs that gluster.org released were a mix of *-3.3.0*, *-1.4.8*, and *-1.0.2* for glusterfs*, gluster-swift*, and gluster-swift-plugin. Kinda ugly IMO. >> >> I propose to produce a set of RPMs that are all glusterfs*-3.3.x*. If I did this right now, everything in f18 would be glusterfs*-3.3.0-4*, with swift-1.4.8. > >UFO = Patched Swift + gluster plug-in. Till the Swift patch from >Gluster is accepted in a release, we will need the patched Swift RPM for >gluster plug-in to work. Bumping up the plugin version to 3.3 does sound >fine to me. > > >Thanks, >Vijay > >_______________________________________________ >Gluster-devel mailing list >Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
