Re: Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "Joe Julian" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then
> > I think it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms.
> 
> Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---
> 
> When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I
> don't think we know, do we?
> 
> And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to
> glusterfs?
> 
> In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of
> extra RPMs. Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a
> convenient way.
> 
> Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a
> heartbeat because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at
> that point.
> 
> Thoughts?

+1 - The goal is to push our changes into the Swift project, and we will continue to work towards that goal, but we don't know when that will happen.

-JM



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux