Re: Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/09/2012 11:51 AM, John Mark Walker wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Julian"<joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then
I think it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms.
Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---

When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I
don't think we know, do we?

And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to
glusterfs?

In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of
extra RPMs. Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a
convenient way.

Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a
heartbeat because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at
that point.

Thoughts?
+1 - The goal is to push our changes into the Swift project, and we will continue to work towards that goal, but we don't know when that will happen.

-JM

Maybe Jason or Leslie's talents could be put to use toward that end? I believe that kind of facilitation is something they work toward.



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux