Re: Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/10/2012 12:02 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:

From: "Joe Julian" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms.

Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---

When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I don't think we know, do we?

And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to glusterfs?


We are working on getting the changes into upstream Swift sources. Once the changes are in, the probability of associated changes to glusterfs being necessary is very low.


In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of extra RPMs. Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a convenient way.

Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a heartbeat because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at that point.

Thoughts?

Sounds good to me.

-Vijay



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux