Re: is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



afr'd is what I meant and somewhere there should be docs on what the namespace is for and what happens when it's not there... suppose when I find time I could edit that wiki...

Sebastien COUPPEY wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:

Matthias Saou wrote:
Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
that example, then?
Just for this part:

volume bricks
  type cluster/unify
  subvolumes afr1 afr2
  option scheduler rr
  option namespace brick-ns
  option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
end-volume

But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.

Perhaps that example should be cleaned up? I know I was confused about it too.

cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my
tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.


--
matthew zeier | Network Engineer | Mozilla Corp. | (650)903-0800 x219





[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux