Re: is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[matthew zeier <mrz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthias Saou wrote:
> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in
> that example, then?

Just for this part:

volume bricks
  type cluster/unify
  subvolumes afr1 afr2
  option scheduler rr
  option namespace brick-ns
  option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5%
end-volume

But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.

Perhaps that example should be cleaned up?  I know I was confused about 
it too.