Re: is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



the article is right. AFR itself does intelligent failover. and you do not
need a namespace unless you use unify.

avati

2008/1/10, Sebastien COUPPEY <sebastien.couppey@xxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello,
>
> http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Understanding_AFR_Translator
>
> the cluster example starting at :  Clustered Mode
> does't seems to me to be redundant as if the brick1 goes down, the
> namespace is not available anymore and the files are also not
> available anymore.
>
> Am I wrong ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
If I traveled to the end of the rainbow
As Dame Fortune did intend,
Murphy would be there to tell me
The pot's at the other end.


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux