On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0800, matthew zeier wrote: > > > Matthias Saou wrote: >> Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in >> that example, then? > > Just for this part: > > volume bricks > type cluster/unify > subvolumes afr1 afr2 > option scheduler rr > option namespace brick-ns > option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5% > end-volume > > But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant. > > Perhaps that example should be cleaned up? I know I was confused about it > too. cleanup or have also brick-ns replicated. Because according to my tests, when I loose my NS ... I loose all the remote files.
