Le vendredi 20 mars 2009, David J. Mellor a écrit : [...] > @@ -94,14 +95,14 @@ the bisection state). > Bisect visualize > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -During the bisection process, you issue the command: > +To see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk', the following command > +is issued during the bisection process: I think it's better to avoid the passive tone, for example like this: "To see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk', you issue the following command during the bisection process:" > ------------ > $ git bisect visualize > ------------ [...] > @@ -173,8 +175,8 @@ using the "'<commit1>'..'<commit2>'" notation. For > example: $ git bisect skip v2.5..v2.6 > ------------ > > -would mean that no commit between `v2.5` excluded and `v2.6` included > -can be tested. > +The effect of this would be that no commit between `v2.5` excluded and > +`v2.6` included could be tested. I'd prefer something like: "This tells the bisect process that no commit between `v2.5` excluded and `v2.6` included can be tested." Otherwise it looks good to me. Thanks, Christian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html