Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/27/08, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:12:55AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
>  > I'm the reason why count-objects, ls-tree and checkout-index are
>  > still offered by the bash completion.  And sitting here reading your
>  > email I realized its been _months_ since I last called checkout-index
>  > by hand.  I still run count-objects and ls-tree very so often, but the
>  > average user probably doesn't use ls-tree.
>  >
>  > So yea, these probably should be removed from the completion list.
>  > But I can make a weak argument for keeping count-objects.
>
>
> I think this message shows the conflict in setting up such a list. We
>  want the command set to be as tiny as possible to help new users find
>  their way. But we want the command set to be useful to git power users.
>
>  I wonder if there should be multiple sets of commands for completion,
>  with a minimal set enabled by default, and a "power user" set that
>  exposes extra commands. I dunno. Maybe that is overengineering. I don't
>  even use the bash completion at all.

How about providing a standard set of aliases? All other SCMs I know
do it. You can type it short/quick without depending on bash.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux