Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:45:26PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > It's not very convincing, because the bash completions script file for git > > is installed by default[1] which completes both forms, so the new user will > > experience instead: > > > > git<space><tab><tab>.... what? 140-something commands? etc.etc. > > No, the point of course is that you should get much less. > > It offers 66 commands to me here, though it's still way too many - some > of them are clearly plumbing: count-objects, ls-tree, checkout-index? > Someone should submit a patch! ;-) (After eliminating these, this comes > down to 56 commands - which is still a lot, but the numbers are getting > somewhat sane already.) I'm the reason why count-objects, ls-tree and checkout-index are still offered by the bash completion. And sitting here reading your email I realized its been _months_ since I last called checkout-index by hand. I still run count-objects and ls-tree very so often, but the average user probably doesn't use ls-tree. So yea, these probably should be removed from the completion list. But I can make a weak argument for keeping count-objects. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
