Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:33 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > 
> > There is one alternative, and one augmentation:
> > 
> >  (A) We do not do anything.
> > 
> >  (B) In addition to the main transition plan, outside git, prepare an
> >      optional "git-old-style" package that installs many "git-foo" 
> >      wrappers in $PATH (i.e. /usr/bin).  Each of them exec "git foo". 
> >      People who like the dashed form can keep typing "git-foo", even 
> >      though that will cost them two exec()s.
> 
>   (C) Just don't do it. Leave the git-foo commands as they were. They
>       weren't actually hurting anyone, and you don't actually _gain_
>       anything by removing them.

Umm.  What exactly makes you feel you should ignore the discussions we had 
around the issues on the git and msysgit mailing list?

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux