On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:12:55AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > I'm the reason why count-objects, ls-tree and checkout-index are > still offered by the bash completion. And sitting here reading your > email I realized its been _months_ since I last called checkout-index > by hand. I still run count-objects and ls-tree very so often, but the > average user probably doesn't use ls-tree. > > So yea, these probably should be removed from the completion list. > But I can make a weak argument for keeping count-objects. I think this message shows the conflict in setting up such a list. We want the command set to be as tiny as possible to help new users find their way. But we want the command set to be useful to git power users. I wonder if there should be multiple sets of commands for completion, with a minimal set enabled by default, and a "power user" set that exposes extra commands. I dunno. Maybe that is overengineering. I don't even use the bash completion at all. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
