Re: [PATCH] Fix t6031 on filesystems without working exec bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex Riesen, Thu, May 22, 2008 15:12:58 +0200:
> Junio C Hamano, Thu, May 22, 2008 11:04:09 +0200:
> > If your repository is marked so that executable bit is untrustworthy
> > there, the check done when switching to branch "a1" to compare if "file1"
> > that is involved in the switch operation has local changes should ignore
> > (apparent and false) executable-bit change, shouldn't it?
> 
> Will see next monday, when I get back to that wretched laptop.
> 

I managed to get my hands on it today and tried the test with your
modification. The test succeeds always and it succeeds with or without
the chmod. So it seems merge-recursive somehow ignores the x-bit from
working tree, I just cannot not find how and where.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux