[PATCH] Fix t6031 on filesystems without working exec bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The point of the test is not really to test the ability of the
filesystem to keep the given x-bit, but to check is merge-recursive
correctly handles it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh |    6 ++----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
index c8310ae..f1c91c8 100755
--- a/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
+++ b/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
@@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ test_expect_success 'mode change in one branch: keep changed version' '
 	git add dummy &&
 	git commit -m a &&
 	git checkout -b b1 master &&
-	chmod +x file1 &&
-	git add file1 &&
+	git update-index --chmod=+x file1 &&
 	git commit -m b1 &&
 	git checkout a1 &&
 	git merge-recursive master -- a1 b1 &&
@@ -25,8 +24,7 @@ test_expect_success 'mode change in both branches: expect conflict' '
 	git checkout -b a2 master &&
 	: >file2 &&
 	H=$(git hash-object file2) &&
-	chmod +x file2 &&
-	git add file2 &&
+	git update-index --add --chmod=+x file2 &&
 	git commit -m a2 &&
 	git checkout -b b2 master &&
 	: >file2 &&
-- 
1.5.5.1.354.g902c


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux