Re: [PATCH] Fix t6031 on filesystems without working exec bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/5/21 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Look at what the "switch to a1 branch after committing to b1" does again.
> You modify "file1" and commit to "b1" and you now have a local change in
> file1 (because you update only the index and not the work tree) that is
> effectively a revert of what you committed just now, and a1 and b1 differs
> at that path.  You get "Entry 'file1' not uptodate. Cannot merge."  when
> you try to switch to "a1".
>
>    $ sh t6031-merge-recursive.sh -i -v
>    * expecting success:
>            : >file1 &&
>            git add file1 &&
>            git commit -m initial &&
>            git checkout -b a1 master &&
>            : >dummy &&
>            git add dummy &&
>            git commit -m a &&
>            git checkout -b b1 master &&
>            git update-index --chmod=+x file1 &&
>            git commit -m b1 &&
>            git checkout a1 &&
>            git merge-recursive master -- a1 b1 &&
>            test -x file1
>
>    Created initial commit bae7a40: initial
>     0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>     create mode 100644 file1
>    Switched to a new branch "a1"
>    Created commit 1f64f65: a
>     0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>     create mode 100644 dummy
>    Switched to a new branch "b1"
>    Created commit 98a1cf4: b1
>     0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>     mode change 100644 => 100755 file1
>    error: Entry 'file1' not uptodate. Cannot merge.
>    * FAIL 1: mode change in one branch: keep changed version

It did work for me when I tried it back then. Maybe I just accidentally
tested something else.

> If we squash the following on top of your patch, I think we can help
> filesystems without executable bit without breaking filesystems with one.
> Can you see if it works on your executable-bit-less setup?

Not in the moment.

> -- >8 --
>  t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
> index f1c91c8..8073e0c 100755
> --- a/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
> +++ b/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
>  test_description='merge-recursive: handle file mode'
>  . ./test-lib.sh
>
> +# Note that we follow "chmod +x F" with "update-index --chmod=+x F" to
> +# help filesystems that do not have the executable bit.
> +
>  test_expect_success 'mode change in one branch: keep changed version' '
>        : >file1 &&
>        git add file1 &&
> @@ -12,6 +15,7 @@ test_expect_success 'mode change in one branch: keep changed version' '
>        git add dummy &&
>        git commit -m a &&
>        git checkout -b b1 master &&
> +       chmod +x file1 &&

Now, this is pointless in my setup. Cygwin just ignores the operation
and decidedddds (presumably according the file _content_ or maybe
phase of the moon) that is not executable. Working tree is still modified.

Maybe I should just live with it (and disable the test locally). It is just
very broken system which hopefully no one besides me ever gets to see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux