On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:15:40AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_updated(struct wt_status *s) > > + rev.diffopt.break_opt = 0; > > I have to wonder how much this is going to make things worse in the real > world, although I agree in the "as we already spend cycles for > detect_rename why not" sense. > > With the recent change from Alex not to run status when not interactive, > it probably does not matter. If we are going to spawn an editor, we are > dealing with human interaction and even -B -M should not be too bad. I had more or less the same thinking, but I don't have any real-world numbers. I would be curious to see averages on how diffcore-break compares to diffcore-rename. Just thinking about it, it seems intuitive that breaking would always be cheaper, which means that adding "-B" to "-M" won't have a significant performance impact. -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
