On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:35:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sorry for the earlier broken one. Here is the correct one I wanted to > send out. > > By the way, this breaks some tests in t4008 (break-rewrite test) because > the test expects the behaviour you found counterintuitive (which was the > reason we have this thread). OK, this looks reasonable to me, and it produces diff results (with -B) that make sense for typechanges. Looking at the failing test in t4008, I like the new behavior better. And maybe something like this on top for git-status? diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c index 0e0439f..e77120d 100644 --- a/wt-status.c +++ b/wt-status.c @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_updated(struct wt_status *s) rev.diffopt.format_callback_data = s; rev.diffopt.detect_rename = 1; rev.diffopt.rename_limit = 100; + rev.diffopt.break_opt = 0; wt_read_cache(s); run_diff_index(&rev, 1); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
