Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Enrico Mrass <emrass@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I'd be curious to learn about norms or practices applied when no consensus >> could be reached. It seems worth elaborating on that as part of documenting the >> decision-making process. > > I may be forgetting things, but I do not know if there is a concrete > "here is a norm that we have been using to reach a consensus, not > just written down but it has been there" in the first place, let > alone "here is what we do to resolve an irreconcilable differences". > > "We discuss and try to reach a consensus in an amicable way, > sticking to CoC, etc." has mostly been good enough for our happy > family, perhaps? > >> ... However, nothing >> in the current description strikes me as specific to these larger-scale >> decisions. > > I agree with that. We didn't hear any more comments on this topic, but writing down how the world works around here, with the goal to eventually have a set of project governance rules, is valuable. Otherwise loud people may act according to their own (unwritten) rules that annoy others and harm the community. Thanks.
