Enrico Mrass <emrass@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'd be curious to learn about norms or practices applied when no consensus > could be reached. It seems worth elaborating on that as part of documenting the > decision-making process. I may be forgetting things, but I do not know if there is a concrete "here is a norm that we have been using to reach a consensus, not just written down but it has been there" in the first place, let alone "here is what we do to resolve an irreconcilable differences". "We discuss and try to reach a consensus in an amicable way, sticking to CoC, etc." has mostly been good enough for our happy family, perhaps? > ... However, nothing > in the current description strikes me as specific to these larger-scale > decisions. I agree with that.
