Yes, sorry for silence on this thread. I am working on a V2 but probably won't have it ready today. On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:45 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Enrico Mrass <emrass@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> I'd be curious to learn about norms or practices applied when no consensus > >> could be reached. It seems worth elaborating on that as part of documenting the > >> decision-making process. > > > > I may be forgetting things, but I do not know if there is a concrete > > "here is a norm that we have been using to reach a consensus, not > > just written down but it has been there" in the first place, let > > alone "here is what we do to resolve an irreconcilable differences". > > > > "We discuss and try to reach a consensus in an amicable way, > > sticking to CoC, etc." has mostly been good enough for our happy > > family, perhaps? > > > >> ... However, nothing > >> in the current description strikes me as specific to these larger-scale > >> decisions. > > > > I agree with that. > > We didn't hear any more comments on this topic, but writing down how > the world works around here, with the goal to eventually have a set > of project governance rules, is valuable. Otherwise loud people may > act according to their own (unwritten) rules that annoy others and > harm the community. > > Thanks.
