On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 10:56:36AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 26/10/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I wanted to build an StGit command that coalesced adjacent patches to > > a single patch. Because the end result tree would still be the same, > > this should be doable without ever involving HEAD, the index, or the > > worktree. > > Wouldn't HEAD need to be modified since the commit log changes > slightly, even though the tree is the same. Or am I misunderstanding > this? This reminds me of someone suggesting that some patches could be represented by more than one commit. But I'm not sure such a beast would be useful - I fear that would make StGIT much more complicated, but would it really make things better ? Best regards, -- Yann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
