On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 06:36:35PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > > > that new progress meter sure is amazing and useful! > > I do agree. There seems to be some glitches though, here is how my > output looks after a git fetch I just did on git.git: > > remote: Generating pack... > remote: Done counting 310 objects. > remote: Deltifying 310 objects... | Here we have a glitch | > remote: 100% (310/310) done `-------vvvv----------' > remote: Total 310 (delta 160), reused 178 (delta 112)iB/s > Receiving objects: 100% (310/310), 379.98 KiB | 136 KiB/s, done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (160/160), done. I know. This is why i TRIED TO KEEP THE "Receiving objects" line as short as possible. > FWIW, maybe instead using spaces to erase lines we could use minimal > vt100 codes[0] like: > > Erase End of Line <ESC>[K > Erases from the current cursor position to the end of the current line. I thought about that too, but this is not perfectly portable to all terminals according to a quick glance at /etc/termcap. Does the Windows console support it? Also we might prefer not to rely on termcap/terminfo library calls. The other solution is to make the remote object summary line a bit longer, but this will be effective only when remote servers are upgraded. Might that be good enough? Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
