On 26/10/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wanted to build an StGit command that coalesced adjacent patches to > a single patch. Because the end result tree would still be the same, > this should be doable without ever involving HEAD, the index, or the > worktree. Wouldn't HEAD need to be modified since the commit log changes slightly, even though the tree is the same. Or am I misunderstanding this? > StGit's existing infrastructure for manipulating patches > didn't lend itself to doing this kind of thing, though: it's not > modular enough. So I started to design a replacement low-level > interface to git, and things got slightly out of hand ... and I ended > up with a much bigger refactoring than I'd planned. Thanks for this. I'll need a bit of time to read it all and give feedback. In general, I welcome this refactoring. I'll go through the whole e-mail in the next days and get back to you. -- Catalin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
